|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- CAR System Introduction
- Objectives of a CAR System
- Common Failures in a CAR System
- Case Study and Lesson-learned
- A Million-Dollar Switch Failure
- “Do it right in the first time”
- Perspectives Beyond ISO9000
- A CAR System Check Sheet
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Corrective Action Request System
- Also called CAR System
- An element of ISO9000/QS9000 standards
- “The supplier shall establish and maintain documented procedures for
implementing corrective and preventive action…” (QS 9000 Element 4.14)
- “The organization shall take corrective action to eliminate the cause
of nonconformities…” (ISO9000 8.5.2)
- Similar applications/systems:
- Safety Action Request System
- Supplier Corrective Action Request System
- Action Management System for Service Sector
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Initiating and Preliminary Analysis Phase
- CAR Number
- Issuer
- Defect Description
- Issue Date and Deadline
- Root Cause Analysis and Implementation Phase
- Real Root Cause
- Action Plan, Due Date, and Representative
- Review and Verification Phase
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Fail to concentrate on evaluating the CA plan, instead focus excessively
on running CAR dispatching processes
- Root Cause: primary interests were stretched thin by the comprehensive
distribution processes
- Fail to use existing data to predict and prevent future failures and
carry over best practices
- Root Cause 1: It is hard to use a single index (risk, cost, or
defective quantity) to predict future product/process behavior
- Root Cause 2:It is an arduous and time-consuming task to summarize data
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- A US major household product company was forced to scrap millions
dollars of products due to a potential fire hazard caused by a defect in
a switch
- Internal investigations uncovered
- Same problem was discovered 4 years ago
- A CAR was issued, and the corrective action was reported completed
- Similar failure mode still could be found in new production, but it did
not catch attention because it was buried in the CAR system by other
high occurrence failure modes
- Further investigation indicated that this high risk problem had been
encountered in similar switch designs, but it was overlooked because of
the defect’s low occurrence
|
|
11
|
- This million-dollar problem could have been prevented
- If results of the CAR could be monitored constantly, and information
could be sent back to production promptly.
- If the failure mode could be
ranked by the failure risk category rather than the quantity of similar
CARs issued
- If the design engineer could learn from or be informed of the history
and the problems of the original designs
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- A division of a Fortune-500 company launched a project called “do it
right in the first time”
- Goal was to improve customer satisfaction and reduce cost
- The project failed because people were reluctant to respond to the
project concept
- “we are human being, we are not perfect, and we are bound to make
mistake from time to time …”
|
|
14
|
- Can we always do things right the first time?
- No, we can’t. We are human being, and we tend to make mistakes
- Wait a minute… Yes, we can, if we can learn from our pervious mistakes!
- This project could have been a huge success if employees were asked to
always refer to the pervious failures as well as the best practice from
the product/process history every time they took on a new project
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- An effective CAR System should
- Achieve the objectives identified in ISO9000
- To eliminate the causes of nonconformities
- And go beyond:
- Streamline the CAR dispatching processes
- Monitor the action results constantly
- Utilize various indexes to prioritize corrective actions
- Risk, cost, defective quantity, and etc.
- Provide product/process history and previous failures to prevent
problems in new product lines
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Maybe we can help at QIT
Consulting!
|